Application processes are becoming increasingly automated, and even small employers now find themselves buried under piles of applications from around the world for every single position they offer. This creates an overwhelming workload for HR departments, pushing companies to seek solutions that streamline their hiring processes and optimize the search for talent.
One of the most popular tools for this is Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS). These systems have become a go-to solution for many companies to manage their hiring processes. ATS act as workflow management tools, helping organize applications and often filtering out candidates who don’t appear to fit the role based on pre-set criteria. However, while these systems are widely used, they are far from perfect. They solve some problems but create plenty of new ones along the way.
From failing to read certain file formats or sections of a CV, to rejecting candidates who don’t use specific keywords, to the risk of built-in bias or human error during setup, ATS have no shortage of flaws. In many cases, these tools prioritize convenience for the company over fairness for the applicant, potentially causing businesses to miss out on top talent.
In our webinar, we’ll take a closer look at the controversies surrounding ATS. We’ll discuss the most common issues these systems cause for job seekers, explore cases of misuse by employers, and uncover how these "helpful" tools can sometimes do more harm than good. Most importantly, we’ll share tips on how applicants can fight back against these relentless algorithms and increase their chances of getting noticed in an automated world.
Founder, CEO, City CV